Sestak and the Reporter Behind the Story

Well, then you missed the point. Especially the 'shoe on the other foot' quip - which makes no sense to me at all.



Anyway, this crap goes on literally every day during campaign season. You're never going to stop it and you're never going to comprehend the scope until you've been inside either party's apparatus (as I have been).



Sestak turned down an offer - so his conscience is clear. Specter took a deal - and we all knew he did, which is likely a major reason why he lost the Primary.



The person who's dirty here is Obama (I don't care which person passed along the "offer," it's his Administration and he is ultimately responsible). That much is clear. But to single this situation out as some sort of affront to democracy, god, and motherhood is patently ab.surd. If you nullified every local, state, and federal election where some candidate was induced to not run, you'd have maybe 5% of the offices filled - MAYBE.



Does it stink? Sure. So now what?



Get over it. Of all the nonsense that goes on, this is the least of our problems.
About Arlen Specter
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

FCC Re-Designation of Broadband Will Bring Unwanted Market Uncertainty

Your "last" investor just left for that reason.



So how many others did you lose and why did they leave? I suspect there are issues larger than the big gubmint straw man driving people away - but I digress....



Reasonable regulation brings stability to industries. The investors probably aren't looking for your couple-percent profit - they want the 500% return bonanzas. In the case of Internet connectivity, that means you and your brethren need an escalation of the usurious rates and diminished service offering to get that return.



So the fact that your investor left says that the days of outrageous fees and low performance are closing and this is definitely a step in the right direction to protect consumers.



Thanks for confirming that for us (even though you're probably a DLC sh.ill).
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Obama's Possible November Surprise

It's sad that you think you're clever.



Your argument is for respecting a king. For a god or some sort of deity in whom there is to be no questioning, analysis, or judgment.



It is so clearly that case - yet you still insist that you are somehow more intellectually gifted and blessed with an insight superior to everyone else (except "him"). And every time you chosen ones be.lch out comments like you just did, you prove that your only prowess is in the disciplined art of suppressing your natural, human inclination toward logical thought - replacing it with some muddled, inherently conflicting gi.bb.erish that sounds great in the caverns of your hallowed echo chamber, but would otherwise get you a "D" in any high school debate or philosophy class.



Or is it more superficial? Maybe you just hate the right to vote (ie judging who should be elected)? Are you disgusted with freedom of speech?
About Tax Day Tea Parties
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost