
The author tends to completely downplay the role that the anti-trust investigat
ions had on the industry.
Previous to those investigat
ions, which attracted many states in the US to join in the suit, gates and company literally did whatever they pleased. Lawsuits against them took so long to be heard that the aggrieved companies gave in to "buyouts" from microsoft or went under entirely. I will leave the readers to research the litany of legal offenses carried out in the 90s by microsoft - documentat
ion abounds on the subject.
So when the Fed and state attorneys general went after them, it breathed new life into companies that innovated (i.e. they were a threat to the most non-innova
tive technology company in history) - they began suing for patent infringeme
nts and other offenses, pursuing and winning cases because Venture Capitalist firms suddenly began to see the revenue potential in winning cases against microsoft. Infringeme
nts meant big payoffs and years of licensing revenue.
Without the technologi
cal equivalent of gold-carry
ing ships to pirate and plunder on the old high seas, microsoft had to do try to build some things on their own. They stink at it. They've always stunk at it.
Which leads me to the final point. The phrase, "... did not even exist when Microsoft first developed an Internet browser." is inaccurate
. They didn't develop a browser. They bought the code from NCSA (it might have been Spyglass then) back in the mid 90s.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment