Hogwash, Mr. President

Opinions form as facts are observed. As more facts appear, opinions can change.



Problem is you want to deny facts that refute your opinions. You also want to insert your opinion as fact - such as claiming that anyone disappoint­ed in this President would want the palin as President (an illogical contention that is simply jaw dropping).



[The latter contention is ironic in a way, because I recall large numbers of gwbush fans telling me in the past that it's wrong to challenge a President - so the brethren with whom you form the holy wall of protection around the President has some common ground with the enablers of the previous regime... that is some dubious emulated company to say the least.]



Those fact averse approaches to debate are always invalid. Regardless of how much faith you have in a human man.
About State of the Union 2011
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost