True, but there was a tremendous amount of time and money invested by liberals in Obama's election. People who didn't have much of anything were donating both of those things to the campaign.
I believe it was done because we want that leader who would take it to the entrenched powers. Someone to lead the charge - just as he did in the 2008 campaign. But then we get bait and switch starting in early 2009 when wall street was re-appoint
ed to run the economy.
Then we hear from the cheerleade
rs that same word (pragmatis
m) is what we need to swallow because pragmatism dictates that you have to compromise behind closed doors on every initiative because, otherwise, you can't pass legislatio
n. That acceptance and active campaignin
g for weak policy and weak politics takes much effort. And it has an effect on folks speaking out, too.
While it is certainly true that "the reasonable people have underestim
ated the less reasonable
," I think I'm seeing that there are plenty of less reasonable liberals in our midst. In their unreasoned desperatio
n, Obama is a great leader.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment