
I agree with your statement about position, but it's irrelevant
. If the point of the poll was to compare the relative strengths of the parties and/or slate of candidates - and I think it is - then the results are invalid without an "independe
nt" option. On face it's invalid purely because there are more options on the ballot than a D and an r.
Even if the word "independe
nt" doesn't correlate directly to Green, Communist, Libertaria
n, or any other specific organized party, the fact that there is an answer that counts folks who aren't on board with either of the two "major" parties definitive
ly increases the accuracy of the poll.
For example, if the independen
t count rivaled that in 1995, there should be a 20% reduction from across the Obama and goper tabulation
s. Who loses the most in that? It would tell a far better story of the mindset of voters.
Of course, if the point of the poll is to perpetuate the preschool-
level profession
al wrestling storyline of "left vs. right," then I guess it's solid work.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment