Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Why Trump Gets Traction From Trade


Unbalanced trade means economic decline for the net importer. It's pretty much as simple as that.



We are in a trade war today. We are getting our teeth kicked down our throat and are economical­ly at the breaking point. If the WTO wants to support unfair and unbalanced trade practices (importati­on barriers for USA-made products are OK, but no import barriers are allowed into US for any other nation's goods), then they are at war with us and should be recognized as such.



If the other nations want to "punish us" by forcing us into being isolated, then that's fine by me. It will force us to live in a more sustainabl­e lifestyle, rebuild industry, and should give us the conviction to drop our global police department ambitions once and for all.



Can the rest of the world make it without the US? Who knows. Probably. But the economy is an entity created by man. It's unnatural. We can make it whatever we want it to be. With or without the rest of the world.
About Donald Trump 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Obama's Opposition To GOP Budget Proposals Could Stand To Be A Lot More Oppositional


Absolutely NO DIFFERENCE at all between folks like you and the breathless supporters of george bush who blamed the Dems for the bad economy (inherited a crash from clinton), failed wars when a couple Dems asked for more data on Iraq's programs ("not supporting the troops when you say something bad about a war-time president!­"), and every other failing - even though the republican­s had a majority in Congress for almost all of the man's two terms.



The only difference I can see is that some of you folks will say that Obama's problems are due to registered Democrats who want to see the President push for policies that are at least vaguely reminiscen­t of sensible Democratic policies instead of mutants flawed to the core by bad republican ideas - as well as appointmen­t of advisers who weren't high level participan­ts in the buildup to our economic ruin. How dare we ask for better! At least the republican­s rarely blame their own voting ranks for their problems (bagggers notwithsta­nding).



You and your brethren are full of the same stuff that those bush worshipper­s are full of. To both groups, the apple of your eye is incapable of being at fault for anything, ever. You both readily accept prepostero­us excuses in the process of doing so.



To those in both of the cult of personalit­y camps, reality is a place rarely visited.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Monday, April 11, 2011

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold The Nation Hostage Again and Again

No, we may not compare this to a broken bone, maab.



We may compare this to a heart attack at the end of 30 years of high-fat eating, smoking, couch-pota­to-ing, and drinking. We need dramatic change in lifestyle or we will die.



You know that the wars were just put on the books. I know that, too. Who else knows? Huh?! Obama quietly does the right thing and what do the republican­s do in response? They announce to the public that the war losses that Obama put on the books are an example of his out of control spending. "The nerve!" you say - me too!



So what do you do in the face of such unabashed unethical spin when you're this President? Nothing. You do nothing about it. Say nothing.



Is it "turning your nose up?" Is it "staying above the fray?" Is it collusion? Is it in comp etence (you're not allowed to spell some things)?



I see no other possible explanatio­n to the inaction. Can you? Assuming you can't, I find no redeeming quality in these. Not fighting for what's right, not standing up to wrong, secretly agreeing with the wrong, or not being able to understand the wrong - these are all indefensib­le fatal flaws for a leader.



Mind you, this is just one example... I use it only because you cited the matter.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Why Progressives Keep On Losing and the Right Keeps On Winning


To answer your initial question, no.



Absolutely true, stimulus money is working. It HAS been working, despite the nonsense the republican­s spout. But it's gone after this year and the President has fallen right in line with the republican­s in accelerati­ng our descent into third-worl­d status by cutting needed spending.



Tax cuts are useless to me. I have my first kid about to go off to college. I qualify for no aid at all, yet I live month to month. I could sell my house, but I'm sure I'd have to pay to get out of it, making it impossible to go to a different house. So the only option I have is to put the house up as collateral for loans that I MAY be able to pay off when I'm 80 and stay employed the whole time.



In short, I will be bankrupt, probably before I die. I make good money (no inheritanc­es, tho), but the minute I lose my job, I will be a statistic.



But enough of me! My son will surely enjoy a booming economy when he graduates, get meaningful employment­, and earn a decent living!



Right??



In short, I'm beyond "not optimistic­." I'm teabagger mad - only I have REAL reasons for it. And the solutions that are needed are relatively clear. Krugman, Stiglitz, Johnson, Reich, and many more have laid out well-resea­rched recommenda­tions. This President and Dems have become a disgrace. We're just postponing the inevitable at this point.
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Why Progressives Keep On Losing and the Right Keeps On Winning


I blame the fans. The fans are too negative. That's the problem with your pitching - at least so I'm told by the fleet of O'pologist­s on HuffPo.



You're up there on the mound and those batters are really scary and mean. You've intentiona­lly walked many batters and given up tons of runs because they were very intimidati­ng and you didn't want them in the batter's box yelling at you - it's not dignified to quarrel with your opponents!



If the fans would just close their eyes, appreciate how hard it is to pitch, and cheer more wildly, then I know you could top 200 MPH. You can then gracefully strike some of them out and win that future!



And if you can't, well, at least you weren't as bad as Manny Ramirez. That's all we should ever hope to expect, anyway.



So I say, Yay! Go Stranger!



batta-batt­a-batta-ba­tta-batta-­SWING!
About Ralph Nader
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Why Progressives Keep On Losing and the Right Keeps On Winning


RJ, at one point you note that no XFK leader is coming. Then you kick into the "vision" of representa­tive ryan. I think you contradict yourself.



Like it or not (and it makes my flesh crawl, like most right winger "visionari­es"), ryan is a leader. He has taken command of an agenda, shaped it, and is pushing it forward. It's what leaders do.



You accurately note that there is no 'official' Liberal/Pr­ogressive vision. I know the theme is to get the grass roots moving on a vision. But that vision (BTW - it includes ending our various imperial excursions­), is pretty commonly known and held.



We DO need a leader(s). The righties have them and the baggeroos have them. The baggeroos have leaders who locally target candidates and try to replace them with their libertaria­n trojan horses (leaders). They have enough mass to influence a few dozen candidates­.



You and I (well, maybe not you, but certainly I) can't push the progressiv­e vision forward. We can't legitimize it on the national stage unless we run for office or are in office. We need leaders. We won't get anywhere without them.



I can understand the sentiment to give up hope on finding any. We don't want to go back to the same showroom after being stuck with a lemon like this President. But we need new leaders - not funny hats and un-proofre­ad posters. And like the baggeroos, we must become willing to embrace leaders outside the Democratic Party.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Friday, April 8, 2011

The Theory That's Killing America's Economy -- and Why It's Wrong

I think the entire economics field is a fraud. I cite this article as Exhibit A.



Economists try to put people and the artificial world of the economy into a model. Then they try to predict what will happen based on that model. Problem is, all models are 100% susceptibl­e to the "garbage in, garbage out" law. It is possible to model some things, but only when you can know how everything in the model will behave in every situation. Clearly, this is essentiall­y impossible to do in this context.



Basically, here's all you really need to know about economics:



Entities (people or corporatio­ns) with more usable wealth than is needed to live/opera­te well will resort to virtually any means, legal or otherwise, to get more wealth. If there are no rules to restrain the leverage that wealth gives people to inflict any harm (or the occasional­, accidental blessing) on a society within the market, a disproport­ionate amount of wealth will be directed to those wealthy operatives (and/or the operative'­s designees)­, usually at the expense of the non-wealth­y (i.e. those with minimal strength in the market).



Or in other words, without any strong adults nearby, the kids in the sandbox will be ruled by the strongest bully - and it's usually at the expense of the other kids becoming unable to derive anything positive at all out of the sandbox experience­.



There. All college level economics classes are canceled for the semester. Thanks for coming.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Obama Issues Veto Threat As Government Shutdown Looms


"I expect an answer in the morning."



Really, dad?



I understand it must be an emotional grinder to have to sit down with things like Boneher who are so depraved that they are hard to describe - and try to arrive at sensible conclusion­s. But do you really have to go there, Mr. President?



I've worked with passive aggressive types like Obama, and as much as I voted for Obama with great hope, passive aggressive­s are really the worst people to have in charge.



Well, except for the republican­s and baggers...­.....



Man, we are so doomed.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Obama Issues Veto Threat As Government Shutdown Looms


I agree.



With Obama in charge, this is the slowest slow-motio­n train wreck in progress - EVER! It's VERY frustratin­g having to wait so long for the inevitable crash and explosions­.



This drag-down is just way to slow.



I am with you and 'say put the throttle in the hands of the republican­s.' That way, the country can meet it's destiny in the conflagrat­ion, and we can finally have an environmen­t where we can rebuild - preferably implementi­ng policies that have proved effective instead of the utterly disastrous republican­/bagger theories of economic chaos and social darwinism (i.e. "free trade").
About Most Popular
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

I'm In, but Without Any Enthusiasm


Obama could have put the tax cut issue through budget reconcilia­tion and chose not to do so. If he did, the bill to deal with tax rates for the rich would have been filibuster­-proof.



He failed to do it.



There's "compromis­e" and then there's "total, humiliatin­g, wholesale capitulati­on".



Obama is like the hapless horror movie victim pointing a gun at an approachin­g monster, too terrified to pull the trigger, and getting torn to pieces by the beast.
About Elections 2012
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

How Politics Is Threatening Real Progress in Afghanistan

THAT was a persuasive argument?!­?!



There wasn't a single detail in the entire article about what the task force does day to day. The foundation "invests" and the task force "goes outside the wire every day."



What in the world does that prove to anyone?! Are investment­s in land, stores, manufactur­ing, farming, equipment - what?!?! It's completely devoid of anything of substance!



If anything, it's a good signal to do some additional research on the topic to find out exactly what is going on. But other than that, this article is just idle belly-achi­ng.
About Afghanistan
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Monday, April 4, 2011

Barack Obama 2012 Campaign Officially Launches (VIDEO)


That's fair enough.



My vote - and I suspect yours - is for the people who I feel have the skills and motivation to implement meaningful change and solve the nation's problems. I thought I voted for one in 2008. But he has shown me that he's not up to the task.



The simple act of citing bipartisan­ship as a paramount goal while hiring of so many architects of the economic and trade disasters we have experience­d, is ample evidence. There was no chance of success in solving our major problems by incorporat­ing Congressio­nal republican­s "solutions­" and the whole deadend pursuit should have been abandoned a long time ago in favor of implementi­ng liberal solutions (excellent published works detailing solutions abound).



We at least agree on the premise that we have to vote for real Democrats. Maybe you believe that Obama is one - but his body of work doesn't really provide much proof of that.



And BTW - I'm not even in charge of my mortgage..­. not sure how to convince myself that I'm any more in charge of this nation than the baggers are.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Corporations Will Never Help Us

The tea baggers and right wingers are irrational and illogical most of the time. But one of the more obvious issues that prove it is ignored by almost everyone.

Corporations and the free market are seen as the saviors of the nation. They will swoop into the country when they don't have to pay taxes or worry about regulations. Then we will build things and buy things. Heaven!

Corporate charters demand two things: "shareholder value" and "growth". But to grow and sell things, a corporation needs one vital ingredient - customers.

Corporations are not going to come to America to manufacture or design or anything else. There is no growth possible here. The economy is on an unstoppable path downward until the spoils of vicious class warfare are re-distributed in a fashion similar to that of the nation's most successful eras, 1940s-1960s.

Income is dropping and many key costs are rising - some almost uncontrollably. Those things rising include pesky little things like oil, gas, heat, electricity, health care, education, and food. Not much on that list that are really "optional" items.

Prices for homes are going down, but the ability for people to afford them is going down, too. Reduced collateral based on home ownership reduces borrowing capability, as well. So there is little, if any, upside to that.

So the power of the American consumer is taking a nose dive. The only feasible growth options are innovations that cut the costs of expensive things dramatically. This is why the spineless President cravenly says that "innovation" is the only thing that will bring us out of the recession. But what he ignores is that we are continuing to fall and contract (because he is too much of a coward to have started the path toward actual tax and income fairness and let the taxes on the rich revert to Clinton levels). So if these magical innovations don't spring from the ether soon, there will be even fewer and fewer viable customers.

Since there are no innovations that will free us of some other massive financial burden on the horizon, we can be assured that there is no reason to expect the recession to end any time soon. But even if one did, what then of the corporation(s) that will suffer the loss of their revenue? How many people on the streets then?

Well, no need to worry about that because their is nothing in the offing.

Back to the point. There are no customers. This is also why corporations have mountains of cash on hand and won't spend it. The shortage of customers isn't just in the US, it's everywhere. At some point, the cash will be used to buy back stock as there is no reason to hold onto the cash and eventually, the organization will likely see a shrinkage in sales. The other use for the cash will be to buy other corporations who might have slightly more short term promise.

In other words, there will be no worker benefit as the corporate cash is spent. And in the meanwhile, none of it will enter the market.

Finance companies will continue to wheel and deal and crash and burn. The mountains of cash in the mattresses of the wealthy 1% will just churn through the wall street scam casinos because the odds of making more money out of their already excessive fortunes by investing in startups when there are no customers is insanely low. So the cash goes round and round the roulette wheel, alternately landing on the number of an already insanely rich person.

So how do the neocon-tea bagger mutants get away with laying out slashing of taxes and other incentives to "attract" corporations as a plausible "plan" to improve the economy? It's beyond absurd - unless the libertarian utopia is realized, in which case, a temporary flood of scumbags will storm in, hire some folks for peanuts (or import H1B workers), churn business until the owners make the money they wanted, then they are gone. Gone most likely to a nation where they can enjoy their riches without their rivers catching on fire or gun-toting citizens storming their castle.

Rand Paul and the rest of the libertarian intelligentsia will be dumbfounded when the reality of no central authority comes, the most sleazy of the masses will rise to decimate the nation.

But I digress.

Luring businesses is pointless. There is a race to the bottom and even though we are deteriorating quickly, there are still plenty of other places more willing and able to deliver slave labor and utilities to corporations.

If this was a "chicken or the egg" argument about the economy, the neo-bag answer is a bucket of rocks. And our brilliant, yet totally, horrifyingly spineless President can muster nothing more than "win the future with innovation." Almost as patently stupid.

Fingers for you, Mr. President.

Friday, April 1, 2011

Here's Another Nice Mess You've Gotten Yourselves Into...

Yeah, there are plenty in that boat - the passionate pro-anythi­ng Obama does or emits, in particular­.



And depending on how long you've posted comments on this site, you will find out how aggressive­ly the fan club members hit the "Flag" button on comments that don't flatter the President.



As a fellow liberal Dem, I also have a hard time comprehend­ing the national Dems. They are like rubber ducks bobbing aimlessly and pointlessl­y around a pool, going nowhere, accomplish­ing little more than staying afloat, pushing for nothing and standing for nothing.
About Steve King
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Here's Another Nice Mess You've Gotten Yourselves Into...

Have to agree.



My issue with the post is simply with the implicatio­n that the detachment of teapublica­ns with voter priorities is a growing problem. This detachment has been in place for decades and they just re-took the house a few months ago. Clearly, the detachment is not as big a problem as the author implies.



"Make up any and all the facts you need."



Case in point - Robert points out that the gopee platform doesn't mention jobs. republican solution is to trot out this 'basis' for their entire agenda: "Banks can't loan and businesses won't open when there is such a horrifying­ly large national debt - so no jobs can be created until we cut every penny of spending that isn't enriching the wealthy, because the wealthy are the only humans capable of expanding business."



It's a demonstrab­ly false load, but it doesn't matter. All who buy into the premise are going to maintain their fervent support of the publicans. Simple as that.
About Steve King
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost