On the Compromiser-in-Chief and Elizabeth Drew's Article

Maybe my elementary school told me wrong, but I thought you vote for who you think will do the best job. It's pretty clear that this President is woefully outmatched in this job. If you think that voting for someone who's better qualified is "wasting" a vote, then finding a word to describe the act of voting for someone who's clearly unqualifie­­d for the job must be so insulting that it can't be used in a moderated forum.



I voted for the man. I'm paying the price for it. I won't vote for more of the same incompeten­­ce. We'd be better off if everyone else did the same instead of cringing behind the fatalistic­­, "the republican will get elected" terrorism routine.



If I can vote for someone else who represents real change, I will. And if that means that the winner in 2012 is going to have substantia­­lly less than 50% of the popular vote, well, so be it. And if that means we get a republican­­, then I'm fine with that, too.



Maybe we'll get what the baggieres have been begging for - an economic nuke that will once and for all pave the way for some actual problem solvers (real Dems) to get elected instead of the trash we have now. It seems change can only come to this nation from rubble.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost