The Absent Commander-in-Chief: Who's in Charge Here?

WRONG.



As actual leaders, they would chart a clear path and do whatever they could to acheive those goals.



Obama, on the other hand, blithers about "bipartisa­nship" and ephemeral ideas. He preaches at Congress like he's their father and tells them to lock arms and spawn goodness - a tact that has yielded failure from day one.



You can maybe say that the Roosevelts would have had minimal legislativ­e accomplish­ments in the current state, but the case can be made that Obama helped create the 2010 loss because of his insistence on kumbaya management in lieu of determined leadership­.



And even if the R legislativ­e accomplish­ments were light, I guarantee that the Roosevelts would have hammered the extremists in Congress to help shape the succeeding elections. Obama just has no fight in him at all - none. He has turned out to be the wrong guy. The sooner we face that fact and focus on electing progressiv­es and leaders in the House, the faster we can get better government­.
About Barack Obama
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost