Obama deserves a second term just as much as HRC and Romney deserve a first term. I don't understand why anyone feels that the governance results would be any different. And I sure don't get the HRC worship that still endures.
HRC is a hawk. She has no credibilit
y outside of Democratic circles. And a huge percentage of her top campaign team was hired by Obama after the general election (that is, ex-clinton White House retreads & rubinites)
. Other than being a little more honest about her beliefs than Obama, her preference
s for economic policy wonks seem to have been the same as Obama's demonstrat
ed beliefs.
So with HRC, we get the same failed friedman market fundamenta
lism, just with a different mouthpiece
. How does that help fix anything?
Aren't there any OTHER Dems qualified to be President? Are there any Dems with the courage to stand up and lead while the President languishes
?
BTW - I'm for a Primary challenge to Obama, but isn't it a little reactionar
y to determine that the 9th was a referendum on Obama?! Seriously, you don't think any other reasons exist to explain the election? Turner ran hard against a Mosque near ground zero and claims that Obama is anti-Israe
l - could appealing to the fears of many in the 9th have made the difference
?
The WSJ declared it a referendum on Obama. Let's not agree with that rag so fast without first doing some homework to understand what actually happened.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment