1. Yes, there is.
- Try again. Per Alan Grayson who has read the 4 page unclassified brief and the 12-page classified brief on "proof" - he's very disappointed. He compares it highly unfavorably to the mountain of data received from HRC on Bengazi.
2. Creamer never said there was something to win.
- You've obviously missed my point which is to counter the article's title. Was that too obvious?
3. This president is not trying to pick a winner in a civil war; John McCain is.
- The link to Soltz's piece is in my comment. Read it to get a up to speed on the sides in that war and how bombing impacts it - or stay in the dark, your choice.
4. That is not our problem because it is not our war.
- Every action has a reaction.
5. Saudi Arabia has stated publicly it supports us attacking Assad. In the ME, that's all that counts.
- Last count I saw is about 5 countries now that support. Out of what, 200? My point was that more countries supported the Iraq invasion.
6. It's called crimes against humanity.
- The United Nations is the internationally recognized entity charged with handling those crimes. Not Obama. "Rule of Law?" "Act of war?" Either of these matter to you?
Try answering the relevant questions and not the ones you feel like answering.
- You go first.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment